Mortgage repayments - how much will you save?
The Bank of England's surprise cut to interest rates from 4.5 per cent to 3 per cent is great news for homeowners with tracker-rate mortgages, which are directly linked to the base rate. Borrowers on Standard Variable Rate (SVR) mortgages will have to wait to see if, and by how much, their lender cuts their rate.
Here is a table explaining how your monthly repayments could be affected by a change in your mortgage interest rate. (Repayment mortgages only).
Below that is a list of which lenders have cut their SVRs so far. (And which haven't).
Interest rate (old rate, new rate) | Monthly repayment on £100,000 | Monthly repayment on £150,000 | Monthly repayment on £200,000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.5% - 3% | Old repayment: £555
New repayment: £474
Saving: £81
|
Old repayment: £833
New repayment: £711
Saving: £122 |
Repayment: £1,111
New repayment: £948
Saving: £163 |
5%- 3.5% |
Old repayment: £584
New repayment: £500
Saving: £84 |
Old repayment: £876
New repayment: £750
Saving: £126 |
Old repayment: £1,169
New repayment: £1,001
Saving: £168 |
5.5%- 4% |
Old repayment: £614
New repayment: £527
Saving: £87 |
Old repayment: £921
New repayment: £791
Saving: £130 |
Old repayment: £1,228
New repayment: £1,055
Saving: £173 |
6% -4.5% |
Old repayment: £644
New repayment: £555
Saving: £89 |
Old repayment: £966
New repayment: £833
Saving: £133 |
Old repayment: £1,288
New repayment: £1,111
Saving: £177 |
6.5% - 5% |
Old repayment: £675
New repayment: £584
Saving: £91 |
Old repayment: £1,012
New repayment: £876
Saving: £136 |
Old repayment: £1,350
New repayment: £1,169
Saving: £181 |
7.0% - 5.5% |
Old repayment: £706
New repayment: £614
Saving: £92 |
Old repayment: £1.060
New repayment: £921
Saving: £139 |
Old repayment: £1,413
New repayment: £1,228
Saving: £185 |
7.5% - 6% |
Old repayment: £738
New repayment: £644
Saving: £94 |
Old repayment: £1,108
New repayment: £966
Saving: £142 |
Old repayment: £1.477
New repayment: £1,228
Saving: £249 |
8% - 6.5% |
Old repayment: £771
New repayment: £675
Saving: £96 |
Old repayment: £1,157
New repayment: £1,012
Saving: £145 |
Old repayment: £1,543
New repayment: £1,350
Saving: £193 |
8.5% - 7% |
Old repayment: £805
New repayment: £706
Saving: £99 |
Old repayment: £1,207
New repayment: £1,060
Saving: £147 |
Old repayment: £1,610
New repayment: £1,413
Saving: £197 |
9% - 7.5% |
Old repayment: £839
New repayment: £738
Saving: £101 |
Old repayment: £1,258
New repayment: £1,108
Saving: £150 |
Old repayment: £1,678
New repayment: £1,477
Saving: £201 |
Compiled by Lauren Thompson and Laura Whateley
Lenders that have cut their SVRs by 1.5%
Lloyds TSB/ Cheltenham & Gloucester/ Scottish Widows
Abbey
Nationwide
Natwest
RBS
Northern Rock
Halifax
Lenders that have not cut their SVRs so far
HSBC
Alliance & Leicester
Barclays
All other banks
All other building socieites
More from Money Central:
Five experts predict how far house prices will fall
The five craziest mortgage deals of all time
Ten tips to avoid repossession
Ten people who predicted the financial meltdown
House prices: the 10 worst performing streets
The 10 worst property investments ever
50 great things you can get free
The 10 most decadent dictators
The 10 craziest parking tickets ever




As a net saver, if the saving rates come down by the same amount, Gordon Brown and the BoE have just cost me £3,000 per year.
What about also now giving tax relief on savings, so that we can all benefit from the latest move on rates?
Posted by: Edward Bancroft | 6 Nov 2008 14:45:08
"Analysts" always describe the impact of interest rate changes on either savers or borrowers.
Many people are both savers and borrowers. I am.
This 1.5% cut in base rate saves me £6.50 per week.
Wow! That is really going to have a seriously beneficial effect on my domestic and business prospects.
Posted by: Redmond | 6 Nov 2008 14:48:21
For the sake of balance, can we have an article aimed at savers titled "Interest rates fall, how much will you loose?"
Posted by: David | 6 Nov 2008 15:24:28
I'm a saver, so I will lose.
Posted by: Al | 6 Nov 2008 15:46:49
Since the majority of UK citizens, and adults, are *net savers*, then these interest rate reductions will leave the majority of the population *worse off*.
The angle the media take of suggesting that "interest rate cuts = good news" is therefore misplaced.
Interest rate cuts such as these reward the same reckless borrowers, living beyond their means, and unable to fully repay their debts, who are the very cause of our current crisis.
Posted by: James Brooks | 6 Nov 2008 16:05:42
How about a page on "How much will I lose?" for the unfortunate saver. I'm sure the full reduction will be passed onto us whatever happens to the borrowers' rate.
Posted by: Richard | 6 Nov 2008 16:07:11
I have a fixed rate mortgage, which I paid extra to setup. I save nothing from this decrease, but I gain the anxiety of wasting money on fixed rate deal and my monthly lose.
Posted by: Tony Gyles | 6 Nov 2008 16:30:34
Having been bailed out by the taxpayer, the banks' reluctance to pass on the base rate cut to borrowers looks like profiteering. How much will they cut the interest paid to depositors? at least 1.5 % I expect. The only beneficiaries of the this base rate cut will be the bank shareholders - and hence the senior management via bonuses.
Posted by: Roy thurston | 6 Nov 2008 16:45:20
@Edward Bancroft- well of course ISAs are tax free, but I take your point, it would be good if all savings were tax free. And the cap on the maximum size of an ISA could definately be increased.
Are there really that many people on SVR mortagages? And if so, why? Why on earth don't they get a tracker (like me) or at least a fixed? SVR will always be the most expensive.
Posted by: noughtpointzero | 6 Nov 2008 17:30:26
@Roy Thurston, you're mistaken re your "profiteering" comment. The banks' cost of funding is not the BoE base rate, it's LIBOR. Your phrase "not passing on" therefore is awry, since the banks are paying considerable more than BoE base rate for their funds. If they were to borrow at LIBOR but lend at BoE base rate, they would lose money and even more banks would be bust.
The purpose of the "bail out" was to restore the banks' capital position, to prevent them failing. In the longer term that will allow them to function more normally, when market conditions also return to normality.
In the meantime, they need to make money on their existing business by widening the margin between what they borrow at (LIBOR) and what they lend at (e.g. mortgage rate), plus tighten future lending criteria so that risky borrowers are avoided. That way they won't go bust, their balance sheets will be restored, and life for all of us can return to normal, eventually.
Posted by: James Brooks | 6 Nov 2008 18:02:31
Don't panic all you prudent savers and renters - you made the right call and will be vindicated - just let the snowball work in your favour.
Renters can sit back and relax even with the latest cut in interest rates on their savings. If you rent a house and your rental payments are less than your mortgage payments on an equivalent property you are quids in - particularly as house prices are falling by on average £900 a week - for renters that is effectively an untaxed gain of £900 a week! That is not going to turn anytime soon despite the desperate urgings of Mandy and Gordon.
Furthermore, although you may only be getting a couple of percentage points on your cash savings the same price deflation is going to hit a whole range of other goods (particularly cars) - so hold off buying for 6 - 12 months and you will be earning a much higher real rate of interest since in six months you will be able to buy pretty much everything much cheaper than you can today.
Look for the real bargains next year - this year just hold on to your hats and save like crazy.
Posted by: Father Ignatius Brown | 7 Nov 2008 09:46:16
There are still plenty of savings accounts offering 6% or even 7% if you are prepared to leave your money there for a year. So in the same way that the rate cuts have not been passed on to borrowers, neither have they been passed on to savers. In fact, you could even try remortgaging with Loyds and just dump the money in one of Nationwide's savings accounts - you might make a profit!!!
Posted by: bill | 7 Nov 2008 10:01:15
'Mortgage repayments - how much will you save?'
'Savings rates - how much will you lose???!!!'
Why should savers again be expected to subsidise over-valued assets and over-borrowed householders?
Posted by: m collins | 7 Nov 2008 10:02:19
So much anger and stress in these comments! This will blow over. The thing to do is CHILL. Worrying etc. is bad for your health, guys...
Posted by: Bob | 7 Nov 2008 10:21:57
You deserve to have it all now. Take more credit, look how cheap it is to borrow. Ooops the bubble burst, pass me the puncture kit. Easy does it now - it looks like it is holding. Right lets pump away.
You deserve to have it all now....
Can we please, please take the time to learn from our mistakes?
Posted by: Chris Buttrick | 7 Nov 2008 10:41:34
@noughtpointzero
There will be an increase in the number of people on SVR, unable to get onto tracker or fixed mortgages as their loan-to-value will be less than 90%. Given that prices have now dropped by 15% YoY, many people who bought within the last 2-3 years will be in negative equity, or close enough to it to prevent them taking out a new mortgage.
Posted by: Colin | 7 Nov 2008 10:51:56
If you have so much savings, isnt it better to pay off your mortgage? The interest on your mortgage is much higher than the interest on your savings gives you. Even better try a current account mortgage.
Posted by: jonny bard | 7 Nov 2008 11:28:49
There's a press release dated 6 November on Nationwide's website saying they're passing on the full rate cut to borrowers with tracker mortgages.
Posted by: Sean | 7 Nov 2008 11:54:16
Your all missing the bigger picture - lower interest rates should help oil the system so the SMALL BUSINESS ENTREPENEUR will benefit, thus helping to keep unemployment low - all benefits, pensions etc depend on this - no taxpayers, you’ll ALL suffer.
Lower savings returns are a small price to pay to keep the ship afloat. House prices will still fall, however, we really need them to be HALF of their obscene PEAK "value".
Any money made, as liquid by house sales should have been seen as unearned income that would have kept prices capped and sensible.
The 12 years of greed has to now be paid for, even by the thrifty, unfortunately.
Who said life was fair?!!!
Posted by: Darius Midwinter | 7 Nov 2008 12:48:56
Yet again Barclays/Woolwich lag behind the others. They just do not care about the small individual account holders. Always slow to react. Why are they not dropping their rates- just too greedy as per usual.
Posted by: Yvonne Pycroft | 7 Nov 2008 19:02:23
Hope this isn`t too long! We have had a mortgage with Halifax since 1992 (£87.500)When int` rates fell by .5% our tracker rate was reduced by £22.09, when rates fell by 1.5% our rate fell by £32.66.We expected a much bigger reduction, possibly as much as £85.00! We complained to Halifax, they were adamant.Can you please confirm who is right please, if we are, would you kindly give us some supporting figures, as we feel short changed?We have a mortgage which is interest calculated daily and we always overpay and usually 3 weeks ahead of due date.9 years left and £45.000 o/s. Thanks,
Tom, Rugby.
Posted by: Tom Bell | 1 Dec 2008 19:38:30